...
Close
Current temperature in Boston - 62 °
BECOME A MEMBER
Get access to a personalized news feed, our newsletter and exclusive discounts on everything from shows to local restaurants, All for free.
Already a member? Sign in.
The Bay State Banner
BACK TO TOP
The Bay State Banner
POST AN AD SIGN IN

Trending Articles

New asthma research effort aims for better understanding, treatments

First Black headmaster in Boston Public Schools leaves a long legacy

Boston-based RODE Architects wins award for sustainable West Roxbury builds

READ PRINT EDITION

Roving Camera 04-28-2016

Should they have to? No. But because some officers have acted inappropriately, they should. It would show they understand they have a problem policing themselves. — Shayna Harris, Housewife, Dorchester
Sure. They’re cops. They need to be watched. There’s no checks and balances when they abuse power. — Mike Greensteen, Musician/Educator, Roxbury
Yes. For their protection. In case something goes wrong and they’re accused of doing something they didn’t do. — Laquia Garris, Student, Dorchester
Yes. We wore them in the military. They have an obligation to the public to let us know what they’re doing. — Keith Bean, Security, Mattapan
Yes. Unfortunately, my interactions with the police have been negative. If that’s how they are as an institution, they should have to wear cameras. — Joshua Loomis, Bartender, Roxbury
Yes. It helps them do their job better and keeps us safe. — Chris Anderson, Billing Coordinator, Brockton
Do you think Boston police should be required to wear body-worn cameras?