Current temperature in Boston - 62 °
Get access to a personalized news feed, our newsletter and exclusive discounts on everything from shows to local restaurants, All for free.
Already a member? Sign in.
The Bay State Banner
The Bay State Banner

Trending Articles

Cambridge Jazz Festival at Danehy Park — all that jazz (and so much more)

Former 1090 WILD-AM director Elroy Smith to host reunion for some of Boston’s best radio personalities

A tribute to a real hero named Mike Rubin


Will Troy Davis be another horrific example of America executing a possibly innocent man?

Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Will Troy Davis be another horrific example of America executing a possibly innocent man?

Barring a last minute stay of execution by the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles in a last-ditch hearing scheduled for Sept. 19, accused Savannah, Ga. cop-killer Troy Anthony Davis will be executed. If the execution goes forth, two compelling questions can never be answered. One is: Did Georgia execute an innocent man? The second is: If it did, will Davis join the list of eight other inmates compiled by the Death Penalty Information Center that states have executed in the last two decades who like Davis might have been innocent?

Dead men literally tell no tales, and the guilt or possible innocence of Davis and the other eight go to the grave with them. The possible innocence of Davis and the other eight condemned and executed prisoners is hardly a stretch. More than a dozen death row inmates have been released in the past two decades as a result of DNA evidence. A legion of other death row inmates have been released because of prosecutor misconduct that resulted in retrials and acquittals, or pardons after mountainous evidence was presented that cast major doubt on their guilt.

The Davis case is a near textbook example of a death penalty case that reaches nowhere near the oft-stated but much-abused constitutional high bar of conviction, namely beyond a reasonable doubt.

The facts in his case are well-known. There was no murder weapon, physical evidence linking Davis to the murder and a score of witnesses that originally implicated Davis as the shooter recanted their testimony. The witnesses, as in many cases where defendants are convicted on the basis of eyewitness testimony, later claimed that they lied because they were scared stiff by police coercion, harassment and threats.

Others cut deals with police and prosecutors to walk free or to get lighter sentences for their own crimes. And then others have long and dubious reputations as jailhouse snitches that prosecutor’s parade to the witness stand to finger a defendant, again in exchange for leniency. The Innocence Project has noted that overzealous and untruthful prosecutors have suppressed, fabricated and destroyed evidence, employed lying jailhouse snitches and untruthful witnesses. Many of the cases have been riddled with racial bias. The condemned killer was black or Latino and their alleged victim was white.

Troy Anthony Davis is black. When defense attorneys appeal these tainted convictions, the courts almost always dismiss their appeals on the grounds that the prosecutor committed “harmless errors” that didn’t affect the outcome of the case. The Texas execution of Ruben Cantu in 1993 for a murder he allegedly committed as a teen was a classic case of how a possibly innocent man can be executed.

Davis has fought hard to prove that he was indeed the victim of a colossal frame-up. The best that he’s been able to do is to push back the date with the executioner. He’s had several stays and even a retrial. But it’s just bought time, precious time. Davis, if it can be called that, is lucky. His fight and the possibility of his innocence have made him a cause célèbre. All prison reform groups, the NAACP and notables from Jimmy Carter to Pope Benedict have spoken out against killing Davis. Many other prisoners that do not have the notoriety, draw press attention and acclaim, and especially the money, and where there are serious questions even doubts about their guilt, languish on America’s death rows.

That’s not likely to change. In 1996, when Congress passed, and President Clinton signed legislation that toughened the death penalty to combat terrorist acts, it reduced appeals and made it harder to get new trials. The year before that, Congress slashed millions in funds for post-conviction public interest, legal interest groups to help inmates such as Davis file appeals.

In every doubtful case, prosecutors hotly deny that any of the men executed are innocent. Despite the questionable executions, no prosecutor, or government official, has ever officially said that an innocent prisoner has been executed. The Chatham County prosecutors and the Georgia state Attorney General that prosecuted and have fought to execute Davis flatly say that Davis is a cop killer who deserves to die.

But despite prosecutors vehement defense of themselves in these questionable cases some officials and judges have strongly hinted and warned that it is possible for an innocent person to be executed. In 1997, the chair of the House Judiciary Committee praised the system of legal checks and balances in place to insure that the rights of condemned killers are fully protected, but admitted that there was no ironclad guarantee that an innocent person could not be put to death.

That’s little consolation for Davis if indeed the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles turn thumbs down on his appeal for clemency. If Davis keeps his date this time with the executioner the question will always linger whether he was yet another horrific example of America possibly executing an innocent man.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst.