Trump deserves no credit for black jobless plunge
Earl Ofari Hutchinson | 1/25/2018, 6 a.m.
Trump predictably wasted no time in crowing that he was the reason for the big plunge in the black jobless rate. It was part of his trademark ego, and part a chance to score political points by digging at the Democrats talking. He bellowed his stock campaign spiel, “What do blacks have to lose by voting for me?“ That aside, what accounts for the jobs surge is a mix of the continuing spiral upward of the economy that began early in Obama’s second term and the entrenched Bureau of Labor Statistics manipulation of who and how it counts as the jobless. The figures more than bear out that Obama must get the political credit for the job upswing. The actual biggest percentage drop in black unemployment didn’t come with the release of the latest BLS numbers, but in the two months from December 2011 to January 2012. That was the tail end of Obama’s first term. The employment cycle continued steadily upward after that.
There is no mystery why the cycle up has continued. There is more state and federal spending on infrastructure projects, expansion of retail, tech and service industries, more robust state budgets due to increased tax revenues and increased investment of foreign companies in the country. The bulk of the jobs, though, are minimum-wage or slightly above minimum-wage jobs, with minimal or non-existent labor protections, health benefits and management promotion opportunities.
There is a dark side that also explains the seeming run-up in black employment. Fewer and fewer blacks are even counted as in the labor force. They are invisible, either because they are experiencing prolonged unemployment, are not actively looking for work, were part-timers, or simply didn’t fit into any of the varied measures the BLS uses to determine who is a valid worker and should be counted.
The other way to cook the books on the employment figures is to downplay the crisis of joblessness among young black males. They are the group that is hammered harder with chronic high unemployment than any other segment of the working population. The news of record high black employment made no mention of whether their numbers also took the same sharp downward turn as the overall black jobless numbers.
The Great Depression-level jobless numbers among young black males was a major issue and sore point during the Obama years for many blacks. At various times the Congressional Black Caucus publicly prodded Obama to say and do more about the joblessness crisis. Obama made it plain then and on the handful of occasions the issue has publicly surfaced since then, that his antidote to high unemployment was to pound the GOP to back his tax hikes on the rich, job creation stimulus measures, and his demand that corporations bring back the tens of billions they’ve parked offshore and plow them into domestic job expansion that generates jobs for all. There was merit to Obama’s position. A recovering, robust economy does mean more jobs. But the troubling question, as always, is who gets the jobs even when the economy officially is humming?