Quantcast

SCOTUS decision on immigration ‘not the end of the road’

No legal precedent set by court’s split decision on immigration reform

Peter Schurmann, New America Media | 6/30/2016, 6 a.m.

Immigrant rights advocates say the Supreme Court ruling on two programs that would have granted temporary deportation relief for millions of undocumented immigrants is a setback. But, they insist, it is not the end of the road.

Shiu-Ming Cheer with the National Immigration Law Center (NILC) called the 4-4 split in the United States v. Texas ruling a “non-decision decision.” With only eight justices on the bench, she explained, the ruling sets no legal precedent and therefore leaves the door open to a number of possible scenarios.

One of those is a re-hearing, said Ming, who spoke Friday during a national press call for ethnic media on the ramifications of the decision and what undocumented immigrants and their families can do going forward. The briefing was organized by New America Media and Ready California, a collaboration of legal and community-organizations working with the state’s immigrant communities.

“The Department of Justice could ask for a re-hearing when a ninth justice is appointed,” said Ming, adding such things are “uncommon but not unprecedented.” She cited instances in 1954, and more recently in 2010 and 2012 when the court agreed to re-hear cases.

The court’s open seat remains unfilled following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February.

Still, Ming noted the process would be lengthy, given the likelihood that a new justice would not be appointed until after the November elections, probably sometime in mid-2017. That would mean a ruling would not be forthcoming until the following year.

Another possibility is that individual states file “affirmative lawsuits” outside the 5th Circuit, where the original challenge to the programs originated. In that case, Ming said, states could claim financial harm as a result of the ruling and seek to put the programs in place on a state-by-state basis.

The two programs, Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) and an expanded version of the 2012 program Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) were announced by President Obama in 2014. Some 5 million undocumented immigrants would have been protected under DAPA and expanded DACA, temporarily lifting the threat of deportation while also granting them social security numbers and work permits.

An economic boost

A study by the Migration Policy Institute found that 36 percent of DAPA eligible families live below the poverty line, and that work authorization for these families would lift incomes by 10 percent.

The Fifth Circuit ruled in favor of a challenge to the programs led by Texas and 25 other states that claimed the programs were unconstitutional and represented an executive overreach by the president. The SCOTUS ruling means the Fifth Circuit decision remains in place.

President Obama called the decision “heartbreaking.”

Aidin Castillo is with the Immigration Legal Resource Center (ILRC), part of Ready California. “Ready California is in full gear” to get the information out about options available to immigrant families, she said. Their top message, she continued; “original DACA remains available. It is not affected.”

To date some 700,000 people have benefited from the original DACA program, which is open to those who meet the following criteria: they came to the country before they turned 16, were born after June 15, 1981, and have resided in the country continuously since June 15, 2007, and who meet educational requirements or have served in the military.