BRA on the chopping block; Walsh’s plans critical to Boston

Martin Desmarais | 11/25/2013, 2:47 p.m. | Updated on 11/25/2013, 2:47 p.m.
Mayor-elect Marty Walsh says he will make sweeping changes to the Boston Redevelopment Authority, moving development planning to a separate ...
Mayor-elect Marty Walsh has proposed a “Fourteen-Point Plan for Economic Development in Boston” that includes large changes to the Boston Redevelopment Authority, including the creation of a Boston Economic Development Authority. Photo by Yawu Miller

Mayor-elect Marty Walsh says he will make sweeping changes to the Boston Redevelopment Authority, moving development planning to a separate agency and making the development process more transparent and accountable to neighborhood residents.

The changes are at the heart of Walsh’s “Fourteen-Point Plan for Economic Development in Boston,” which would restructure the BRA for the first time in more than 50 years.

The highlights of Walsh’s plan include the creation of the Boston Economic Development Authority, an entity separate from the BRA that would be responsible for planning, research. The new agency would have its own manager and board and be subject to oversight by the Boston City Council.

Boston City Councilor Felix Arroyo, a co-chairman of Walsh’s transition team, said he wholly supports the mayor-elect’s call for more transparency in the development process.

“What comes up from residents and developers is the same and that is more transparency,” Arroyo told the Banner. “Everyone wants to be very clear about the process and what it takes.”

A key step toward greater transparency is a requirement that the BRA give greater explanation of why decisions are made and make sure that all projects that are approved are done so based on merit, Arroyo said.

“Right now, frankly, it feels like it isn’t clear what the community process always is and how much input the community has on a project,” he said.

From a developer’s perspective, according to Arroyo, the feeling is the process of getting a project done from start to finish is not clear and they do not have confidence in exactly what they have to do to make sure their proposals become a reality.

While Walsh’s call for separating the planning function at the BRA from development worries some, Arroyo maintains that neighborhood activists are in support of the move.

“This needs to be fixed — that is the perception in the neighborhoods and the only way to deal with that perception is to actually fix it,” Arroyo said.

He emphasizes that people want to see change happen — they don’t want to just hear politicians continue to talk about changing the BRA and the development process without some kind of structure change in the way things are done.

Lydia Lowe, director of the Chinese Progressive Association, says that her organization’s work with development projects in Chinatown have long resulted in a call for change to the way BRA does business.

“I definitely think the BRA needs either elimination or reform,” Lowe said. “I think there has been major problems with the lack of transparency.”

Lowe said that with all the development pressure on Chinatown, the community and her organization are constantly involved in feedback on proposed or planned development, but the feeling is that their comments fall on deaf ears even when it comes through public meetings set up specifically to hear what the community has to think about development.

“None of it really matters to the BRA,” she said. “They go about doing want they want anyway.”