Top firm donates time to advocate for kids
Allison Kelso | 7/9/2009, 7:41 a.m.
Nestled in the bustle of Downtown Crossing resides the offices of Massachusetts Advocates for Children (MAC), a small advocacy group dedicated to helping disadvantaged children. With more than 800 phone calls for help coming into the office each year, the nonprofit and its staff of 16 has been overwhelmed by the amount of Massachusetts families in need.
But as of last month, MAC has a new partner dedicated to its cause.
International law giant DLA Piper’s Boston branch will donate a base 1,000 hours of its lawyers’ time for the Education Rights Project, an initiative to tackle the challenges facing low-income children with disabilities.
“We’re able to expand our capacity to help kids,” MAC Executive Director Jerry Mogul said. “We’re very grateful to them.”
MAC currently takes on 40 to 50 cases each year, with approximately one-fifth of those handled by pro bono attorneys.
Mogul said the project will enable the nonprofit to exponentially increase its caseload, helping more families and making larger changes to the system.
“It’s just really exciting,” he said.
According to their 2006 study, “Transforming the Boston Public Schools,” nearly 20 percent of BPS students are enrolled in special education.
Since its inception in 1969, MAC has pioneered reform and was a driving force behind the enactment of Chapter 766, the main Massachusetts special education law. The agency also assists individual families that seek to obtain the services for their child from the state.
According to Matt Iverson, manager of DLA Piper’s Education Rights Project, the initiative is the Boston office’s first “signature project,” where a branch teams up with a nonprofit as they have with MAC. This is part of DLA Piper’s larger pro bono commitment, to which they have pledged over 150,000 hours for 2009.
This particular project is divided into four areas of focus, each of which has a team of lawyers dedicated to its goals.
One team will focus on the BPS system, particularly on issues relating to the translation of information for parents. Another will analyze statewide special education issues, with an emphasis on how children with disabilities transition out of high school.
The third team will advocate for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder, which MAC previously identified as a significant issue. It launched an ASD Legal Support Center in 2003. Additionally, a synergy team is being developed to focus on the relationship between insurance, national health care and financial corporate sponsors.
To date, approximately half of the lawyers on staff are already working on the project, with six cases in the works.
In addition to cases of client advocacy, where MAC refers an individual to the firm for assistance, the project members will work on systemic change, making strides to ameliorate special education policy, Iverson said. He stressed, however, that cases will not be chosen simply for their policy implications.
“If someone needs our help, we’re going to provide it,” Iverson said. “We’re not going to cherry-pick cases that we think are going to provide … court precedent. [But] we are going to keep an eye out for cases that might do that.”