Quantcast

From FDR to Obama, a fight for health care

Associated Press | 7/8/2009, 5:37 a.m.

NEW YORK — As Congress takes on President Obama’s call for overhauling health care, the desire for change will be tested — by the expense, by politics, by resistance from doctors and private insurers, and by the general fear by some of “socialized medicine.”

The terms of the debate are as old as the debate itself.

Since Franklin Delano Roosevelt considered national health care in the 1930s, virtually every president has sought to expand or universalize medical coverage. Public support has been as consistent as the countering arguments — it costs too much, it doesn’t have the votes, it will ruin the free market system.

“For people who know the boring details of health care, the debate is really déjà vu all over again, although I’m not sure the general public picks up on all the echoes from previous debates,” says James A. Morone, co-author of “The Heart of Power,” a newly released history of health care and the presidency.

The Obama administration is advocating a government-sponsored health insurance plan that would compete with private companies, a proposal strongly opposed by insurers and many Republicans. Individuals and small businesses would get to pick either the public plan or a private one through a new kind of insurance purchasing pool called an exchange. Eventually, the exchanges could be opened to large companies as well.

The approach is the latest variation of a decades-long quest. Care for all has been advocated since the Progressive era before World War I and was first taken seriously in the White House by Roosevelt, when the Great Depression led to the creation of Social Security and numerous other government programs.

Roosevelt was enormously popular and persuasive, and had large Democratic majorities in Congress, but no health care legislation was passed or submitted. Roosevelt would periodically raise the issue, commission studies and then drop it.

“I don’t think his heart was in it,” Morone says, “and that’s ironic because since he had … polio and was in a wheelchair, he understood better than any president what it meant to be sick.”

Roosevelt’s successor, Harry Truman, was openly committed to health care for all. He mentioned it often and seemed in a good position to achieve it after his stunning victory over Republican Thomas E. Dewey in 1948. But Truman never made a serious effort.

Republicans, meanwhile, were surprisingly willing, and able, to extend coverage. Dwight Eisenhower was a free-market man and a determined budget cutter, but he made an exception for health care, successfully backing legislation that made coverage provided by employees tax-free and granting medical coverage to federal employees.

His reasons were at least partly personal. His mother-in-law had fallen ill and required medical treatment for two years, an ordeal that was emotionally and financially devastating. His determination was such that when the American Medical Association (AMA) helped block a plan that would have encouraged insurers to take on high-risk patients, he fumed and called the AMA “a little group of reactionary men dead set against change.”