Voter suppression laws ‘biggest setback in decades’

Suzanne Manneh | 5/9/2012, 9:34 a.m.

A 2006 study conducted by the Brennan Center revealed that 11 percent of eligible voting Americans don’t have the IDs required by voter laws, 18 percent of the 18-24 and over 65 age groups don’t have them, and 25 percent of African Americans do not.

But, she stressed, state legislators who pass these laws don’t necessarily have the last word. “The courts, the DOJ, and sometimes even voters, can overturn bad laws.”

One example she offered was a 9th circuit court of appeals ruling last week on an Arizona law, part of proposition 200, a ballot initiative passed in 2005 that requires proof of citizenship to vote. The court found the requirement to be in violation of federal law.

The ruling, she said, has already stalled a similar bill that was moving in Missouri.

Additionally, laws passed in Alabama, Kansas and Tennessee may face legal challenges, while in Wisconsin, two state courts have blocked voter identification laws.

Myrna Perez, senior counsel with the democracy program at NYU’s Brennan Center, said such laws are jeopardizing the equality of voting.

Voting is the cornerstone of democracy and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), reauthorized in 2006, has been responsible for decades of equal opportunity, eliminating such discrimination as literacy tests and grandfather clauses, she said.

But Perez notes that six states —  Alabama, Arizona (which recently dropped its suit, but will re-file), Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas — have filed lawsuits contending that Section V of the VRA should be ruled unconstitutional.

Section V requires an administrative procedure or a three-judge panel of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to review any proposed voting changes and to approve them only after ensuring they are not racially discriminatory. Voter identification laws fall into this category.

Reports show that Georgia is also considering a challenge to Section V.

Commonly known as pre-clearance, the provision applies to nine states and selected jurisdictions. Of the states filing suit, Alabama, Arizona, South Carolina and Texas are among the nine that Section V applies.

However, in states like Texas, where there has been a significant population increase over the past decade — a total of 4.2 million, with 3.7 million from immigrant communities, including 2.7 million Latinos — 70 out of 240 counties do not have voter identification centers.

According to Martinez Fischer, there is no office downtown or west of downtown in San Antonio. The city, the second largest in the state and the seventh largest in the country, has only three offices.

“If you don’t have a license, it’s likely that you don’t drive,” Martinez Fischer said. “If you have a license, you could vote, but if you don’t have a license you’d have to travel an excess of 100 miles to get to the nearest DPS (Department of Public Safety) office to get these documents,” he explained.

He also said the state hasn’t expressed any interest in accommodating voters by deploying mobile voter identification stations to make it easier for working individuals to obtain IDs who couldn’t access the offices during weekday business hours.

“You hear over and over again about how important it is to have integrity in the ballot box, so there must be a very big problem in Texas,” he said. “But it probably surprises you to know that of the number of votes cast in the 2008 and 2010 elections — there were 13 million votes — there has only been one case that deals with this problem of voter impersonation. That was in 2008 in San Antonio.”

“Can you show me it’s a statewide problem? Clearly it’s not.”

Martinez Fischer said he wished there were the same stellar numbers and efforts by politicians to tackle more pressing issues such as education and health care.

“I wish I could say there were one child uninsured out of 13 million,” he said.

New America Media