WASHINGTON — Human rights activists waging a high-profile campaign to end the violence in Sudan’s western Darfur region are pushing President-elect Barack Obama and his team to re-energize efforts to end the nearly six-year conflict.
Even before Obama takes office next month, advocates want members of the incoming administration — some of whom have intense and personal interests in the issue — to make Darfur a top foreign policy and national security priority and begin identifying top officials to concentrate on the crisis starting on Jan. 20.
The activists believe Obama, America’s first black president, is well positioned to ride the wave of popularity and goodwill that his election has sparked to rally the world to their Darfur cause, which has struggled for attention amid other overseas dilemmas and the financial meltdown despite continued fighting that has claimed up to 300,000 lives.
“There is a new window of opportunity,” said Jerry Fowler, director of the Save Darfur Coalition, an umbrella group of 180 organizations that claim to have 130 million members and supporters. “We want them to take advantage of this incredible outpouring of enthusiasm in the rest of the world to the election and launch a sustained peace process to end this.”
Coalition members have put forward a six-point proposal they want to see the Obama team initiate now.
It calls for the identification of a senior-level official to handle the Darfur portfolio, creation of a State Department “cell” to monitor the situation full-time, and the appointment of two special envoys: one to deal with Darfur and the other to deal with the faltering peace deal that ended Sudan’s long-running North-South civil war.
They also want the new administration to work with the U.N. to expand an existing arms embargo and enforce a ban on offensive military flights over Darfur by the Sudanese.
The Obama camp has not addressed the specific proposals but has given them a general endorsement.
“We welcome these recommendations,” said Brooke Anderson, a national security spokeswoman for the Obama transition team. “President-elect Obama has repeatedly underscored his commitment to more effective action to end the genocide in Darfur.”
During the campaign, Obama made numerous impassioned references to Darfur.
“We can’t say ‘never again’ and then allow it to happen again,” he said in one video message to supporters. “As president of the United States, I don’t intend to abandon people or turn a blind eye to slaughter.”
And Secretary of State-designate Hillary Rodham Clinton, U.N. ambassador-choice Susan Rice and national security adviser-pick Gen. James Jones also have spoken out before and during the campaign about the need to do more in Darfur.
In addition, the inclusion of Obama adviser and genocide expert Samantha Power on the State Department transition team despite her Democratic primary dustup with then-candidate Clinton has raised hopes.
“There has been a lot [of] chatter about this being a team of rivals, but the one thing they have been unified on has been the need to end the genocide in Darfur,” Fowler said. “They have all been strong advocates for ending this.”
The Bush administration made Darfur, which it labeled a “genocide” in 2004, a high priority on its Africa agenda, but has frustrated activists by not appointing more senior envoys to deal with it or persuading other nations to go along with sweeping sanctions against the government in Khartoum, which is widely blamed for much of the turmoil.
Bush himself recently lamented the pace of U.N. efforts to end the killings in Darfur, delivering strong words after meeting with a victim of the violence who was hidden by a red, black and white sheath for her safety. Bush backs a 26,000-strong peacekeeping force in Darfur, which has struggled for viability with a lack of troops and transport.
And the White House last Thursday released a fact sheet asserting that Bush is “leading the global response to the crisis in Darfur” and noting that the administration has given more than $5 billion in assistance to Sudan since 2005 and hundreds of millions of dollars to support the peacekeeping force.
However, many have been disappointed that Bush has not done more and by his decision not to use the Beijing Olympics as an opportunity to press China — a main Sudanese government ally — harder on the Darfur issue.
“Unfortunately, the Bush administration’s words have not been matched by deeds,” Sen. Clinton said during her presidential campaign. “Its actions have been ad hoc and inconsistent.”
Susan Rice, the State Department’s top Africa diplomat during President Bill Clinton’s administration, has gone on the record with support for Congress authorizing the use of force to end the Darfur genocide.
Around the world, much is expected of Obama
Here’s all Barack Obama has to do to meet the world’s expectations if he’s elected U.S. president: End an unpopular war in Iraq, heal misery in nations hit by the global
food crisis and stop global warming, in addition to building bridges to
Muslim countries and reversing the unilateralist approach of the Bush
administration. More »
Parallels drawn between South Sudan, Darfur wars
"What's happening in Darfur has been called a genocide,
and actually is a genocide," said David Chanoff, Ph.D., academic
adviser to the Sudanese Education Fund. But it's "a relatively minor situation, [compared] to the genocide that took place in South Sudan." More »
Delegation uses influence to curb violence in Darfur
"We are not here on a sightseeing tour. We hope we can do something
that will make a significant difference ... and bring peace," Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who
won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1984 for his fight against apartheid in
South Africa, told reporters after the delegation arrived in El Fasher,
the capital of North Darfur province. More »
The Bay State Banner
23 Drydock Avenue
Boston, MA 02210